By Will Rietveld
As I have often mentioned, my preference for a backpacking
shoe is a lightweight trail runner with a wide toebox, snug heelcup,
all-synthetic upper with welded construction, good midsole cushioning, rock
plate, and an aggressive outsole for good traction.
That said, I know that footwear is a very personal thing,
everyone has different preferences, and different hiking conditions call for
different footwear.
In general though, when you carry a light back, you can also
wear light shoes, which get the job done just as well as the heavier clunkers,
and save a lot of energy.
The main reason I love a wide toebox is because I have wide
feet, but beyond that it’s important to note that, as the miles mount up, whether
you’re a runner or a hiker, our feet swell and it helps a lot to have a wide
toebox to accommodate the expansion.
The new Topo Runventure 2 Trail Running shoe weighs just 9.2 oz/shoe for men’size 9 and has all my desired features for lightweight and ultralight backpacking. (Topo Athletics photo.)
|
Specifications and Features
Manufacturer
|
Topo Athletic (www.Topoathletic.com)
|
Model
|
Runventure 2 Trail Shoe and Topo Gaiter
|
Materials
|
Nylon mesh upper with TPU overlays, EVA midsole, rubber
outsole
|
Features
|
Roomy toebox, snug heelcup, padded tongue and heel,
moderate cushioning, rock plate, grippy outsole, zero drop.
|
Weight
|
9.2 ounces/shoe (men’s 9); 11.1 oz/shoe for tested men’s
12. Size L/XL gaiter weighs 1.25 oz/pr
|
MSRP
|
Shoes $110, Gaiters $20
|
Description
The above table provides most of the relevant information
describing the shoes. Compared to the Terraventure shoe the Runventure 2 is a
bit lighter (1.2 oz/shoe less), is zero drop compared to a 3 mm heel rise, has
less cushioning, and has a bit less stability control. The upper and stiffness
are similar.
The Runventure 2 shoe is zero drop, meaning no heel lift.
That platform is preferred by many runners, but preferences run the gamut, and
most running experts emphasize that a conditioning period is necessary to
adjust to zero drop shoes. I note that the Topo Terraventure and Hydroventure
shoes, which I have previously reviewed, have 3 millimeters of heel lift. Over
time my feet have adjusted to these flatter platform trail runners, and I have
no problems with them, although I don’t see any particular advantage of using
them for hiking and backpacking compared to conventional shoes.
Testing
I wore the Runventure for day hiking, trail running, and backpacking on a total of 23 outings totaling 39 days. |
I used them mainly on rocky trails, but there were some
notable exceptions which included some off-trail day hikes and a 9-day 78 mile
traverse in the Grand Canyon which involved
backpacking in very rough and steep conditions.
I have wide feet and find the Runventure just barely wide
enough for me when worn with thin socks.
The Runventure performs superbly on trails, providing great
traction, cushioning, and agility. Actually, the Runventure is remarkable in
that such a lightweight shoe can provide so much foot protection, comfort, and
trail performance.
For most of my testing, on trails, I found the Runventure to
be very durable for their light weight. This is, of course, the intended use
for the shoes. The welded upper with TPU overlays helps a lot for this.
The Topo Gaiter stayed put and kept debris out of my shoes while trail hiking, but it was a different story while hiking off-trail.
|
I
found the gaiters were not tight enough over the top opening of the shoe to
keep debris out, and the hook-in-hole gaiter attachment at the back of the
shoes frequently came loose. The heel attachment is simply too cumbersome. Most
of the time I left the gaiters attached to the shoes and slipped my foot
through the gaiter first and then into the shoe; still too cumbersome. I would
be happier with a simple hook-and-loop attachment at the heel, and a tighter
fit over the top of the shoe.
Assessment
Overall, the Runventure 2 has all the features and performance
I desire for a good trail running, trail hiking, and ultralight backpacking
shoe on trails. However, this shoe just doesn’t have enough beef and durability
for off-trail hiking (which is not their intended use). I like the Topo
Terraventure better for that purpose, although I wore holes in the sides of
them too.
It would be nice if Topo would develop a beefier shoe that
can take the abuse of off-trail running and hiking, something akin to the New
Balance Leadville or Montrail Hardrock. These of course would weigh a bit more,
but Topo designers are experts at packing a lot of performance into minimal
weight.
I note that a lot of lightweight and ultralight backpackers
prefer Altra shoes, the Lone
Peak in particular. The Lone Peak
has most of the same attributes as the Topo trail runners, and is somewhat
beefier and more durable. They weigh a bit more too, 12.2 oz/shoe versus 10.4
oz/shoe for the Terraventure in my size 12. The uppers on the Lone Peak
are a very durable nylon mesh, but they are stitched, which is not my
preference. The side seams on the Altras have also opened up from my off-trail
use.
Bottomline, for trail use, Topo nails the feature set that I
consider to be ideal, and I highly recommend both the Terraventure and
Runventure for lightweight hiking and backpacking on trails and less punishing
off-trail use. However, they don’t have the beef (stiffness, cushioning,
durability) for hardcore off-trail hiking.