By Will Rietveld
Klymit’s Inertia series of sleeping pads are characterized
by lots of cutouts to reduce weight and act as “Loft Pockets” for your sleeping
bag to expand into, increasing warmth. The pads are also thinner, and several
models come with an inflation bulb and second fitting on the pad to inflate the
pad firmer. This one does not have that feature; it inflates by mouth only.
Closeup of the pad's cutouts (Loft Pockets) and attached pillow. |
Looking at the Inertia Ozone (or any other pad in this series),
one can’t help but be a bit skeptical of its comfort. There’s only one way to
find out, and that is to put it to some tests.
Specifications and Features
Manufacturer
|
Klymit (www.klymit.com)
|
Model
|
Inertia Ozone
|
Included
|
Pad, repair kit, stuff sack
|
Materials
|
30D polyester top, 75D polyester bottom
|
Weight
|
Measured weight 12.95 oz (pad only, mfr specification 12.2
oz
|
MSRP
|
$79.95
|
Testing
The comfort of a sleeping pad depends on a person’s sleeping
position and the surface she is sleeping on. A belly or back sleeper can find
easier comfort on a thinner sleeping pad because her weight is more
distributed. However a side sleeper’s weight is concentrated at the hip and
shoulder, so pad thickness and firmness matter. The hardness of the underlying
surface is important too; a softer surface like vegetation or sand offers some
additional cushioning, while a rock-hard surface leaves the cushioning entirely
to the pad.
I tested the Inertia Ozone pad on a Colorado River rafting
trip through the Grand Canyon for 16 days, and
also did some testing at home to further evaluate it in relation to different
sleeping positions and surfaces.
My first night on the pad was in the woods outside Flagstaff, AZ
sleeping in a tent on hard ground. I inflated the pad as firm as I could by
mouth and slept on my side. It was a very uncomfortable night.
The pad did better on my rafting trip where I slept on it
several nights on dry sand. Sand is a bit softer than rock-hard ground, which
helped, and I also learned that the best sleeping position on this pad is belly
sleeping, and I presume back sleeping as well, although I didn’t try it. As
mentioned above, belly sleeping spreads my weight out, so the pad cushions me
better, and I could actually deflate it a little to make it softer.
The attached pillow works well to support my head, and I
could deflate it a bit, if needed, to get it exactly the right height, or put
something under the pillow to raise it.
The bottomside of the pad is slip-resistant, so I didn’t
have any problems with it sliding around in a tent.
My tests at home agreed with my field testing. On the hard
surface, belly sleeping is preferable and side sleeping can be uncomfortable.
However, side sleeping works out better with some additional cushioning under
the pad (dry sand, softer ground, vegetation); it makes a big difference in
terms of overall comfort. For this pad, full inflation seems to be the best,
especially for side sleeping.
Although the pad's "Loft Pockets" may provide some benefit from allowing a sleeping bag expand into them, the feature could work in reverse for someone sleeping under a quilt, i.e. the pockets could be cold spots or drafty.
Assessment
My opinion, after testing the Inertia Ozone with different
sleeping positions and surfaces, is that its sufficiently comfortable to get a
good night’s sleep while belly sleeping or perhaps back sleeping. However, if
you are predominantly a side sleeper, you would probably be better off choosing
a solid, thicker pad (no holes). Numerous lightweight pads are available that
are 2.5 inches thick and weigh around 12 ounces, the same weight as the Inertia
Ozone, sans pillow. However, the attached pillow is a nice convenience and
functions well.
The Klymit Inertia Ozone can be a good choice for a belly sleeper. It's full-length, supportive, compact for packing, and the pillow is part of the pad. |
This station performed superior with the rafting excursion where by When i slept on there various night time with dried crushed stone. Crushed stone is usually a little gentler in comparison with rock-hard surface, which often served, in addition to When i likewise learned that the most beneficial sleep location within this station is usually abdominal sleep, in addition to When i think returning sleep likewise, while When i didn’t try it out.
ReplyDeleteNice
ReplyDeleteThanks for the review. I'm a back sleeper so I think this one here is not suited for me. I usually go for sleeping backs that can take a lot of abuse since we don't get a similar ground surface everytime. Price is also a consideration, although I won't sacrifice quality, durability for some substandard products - that's a given. I also camp during the winter months so the pad's R value is a consideration, too. I've recently stumbled on a site that has a list of backpacking sleeping bags that are awesome. Check it out, it might be of help http://myoutdoorslife.com/gear/camping-and-hiking/the-best-backpacking-sleeping-pad.html
ReplyDeleteThanks author for share the review. you can also visit cody lewis.
ReplyDelete