By Will Rietveld
Many readers are already familiar with the popular ZPacks
Duplex Tent, which is a Cuben Fiber 2-person single-wall trekking pole
supported shelter with two doors and vestibules, a mesh entry and perimeter,
and a bathtub floor. The weight is 20.7 ounces, which is amazing for a roomy
2-person shelter.
I was introduced to the Duplex Tent when two of my
backpacking buddies got this shelter for one person. I was envious of its
roominess, and impressed with its design and performance in rain and wind.
Then, when I visited the ZPacks website, I found something
really interesting: ZPacks has another version of the Duplex available, the
Duplex Tarp without any mesh or floor. Everything else is the same, except this
version is meshless and floorless. The weight, according to ZPacks is 10.7
ounces for the shelter with guylines. That’s half the weight of the Duplex Tent
(20.7 ounces).
The meshless, floorless Duplex Tarp weighs half as much as the Duplex Tent. |
About that time my inner gram counter got really excited!
The Duplex Tarp has a wonderful design and amazing roominess for just 10.7
ounces (the measured weight is actually 9.85 ounces, sans the mid-side
guylines).
While many hikers won’t consider a floorless shelter, I
happen to like floorless. There’s only one door to enter, more usable protected
area inside, and it’s a good option if you hike with a dog. I usually camp
above treeline where bugs are not a big issue, but I realize that excluding
bugs and creepy crawlers is a major requirement for many hikers.
So how well did the Duplex Tarp meet my expectations? Read
on to find out.
Specifications and Features
Manufacturer
|
ZPacks (www.zpacks.com)
|
Model
|
Duplex Tarp
|
Capacity and Style
|
2-person, 2 trekking pole supported, single-wall floorless
shelter with 2 doors and vestibules
|
Dimensions
|
53 in wide (86.5 in wide including vestibules) x 100 in
long x 48 in high
|
Weight
|
Measured weight 9.85 oz for shelter and 6 guylines;
manufacturer specification 10.7 oz for shelter and 8 guylines
|
Materials
|
0.51 oz/sq yd Cuben Fiber
|
Features
|
Guylines with Lineloks allow easy tensioning and adjustment
of shelter height; 2 side entry doors with vestibules; door panels overlap,
are secured with a toggle, and are extended with Dutchware Hooks; tensioned
catenary ridgeline; 8 staking points with guylines and Lineloks, clothes line
loops inside
|
MSRP
|
$375
|
Setup and Use
I particularly like the design of this shelter. It has two
peaks supported by trekking poles, with a catenary ridgeline between them that
is tensioned with guylines from the peaks to the ground. This gives the shelter
a very taut and storm-resistant basic structure that is further strengthened by
tensioning the corner and mid-wall guylines.
ZPacks lists the shelter’s dimensions as 53 inches wide, 100
inches long, and 48 inches high at the peaks. My measurements came out a little
short on the length. I found that angling the poles out a bit provides a width
up to 68 inches, but that extends into the vestibules a bit and reduces
headroom. With trekking poles set to 48 inches as specified, and sloped walls
pinned to the ground the measured length is 86 inches and height at the center
is 42 inches; extending the corner guylines increased the length to 94 inches;
lengthening the poles to 52 inches and further extending the corner guylines
did not change the width but did increase the headroom at the center of the
shelter to 46.5 inches. In summary: 1) the width can be increased a bit by
angling the poles outward; 2) it is difficult to get the full specified 100
inches of length, but 86-94 inches is adequate; and 3) the specified height is
at the peaks, which are about 4 inches higher than the center of the ridgeline.
Setup is simple and fast: 1) lay the shelter out in the
desired location (preferably with the sloped sides facing the wind); 2) stake
the four corners loosely, 3) insert the trekking poles (adjusted to about 48
inches) in the peak pockets and raise the tent (angle the bottom outward a bit
to increase interior elbow room); 4) stake the guylines from the peaks; and 5)
tension the guylines all around.
I found that a Gossamer Gear Polycro 2-person groundsheet (3.65
ounces) fits the Duplex perfectly, and is quite durable. It can be adapted to a
“bathtub floor” by attaching a short piece of elastic cord and hooks to the
corners of the groundsheet (reinforced with tape), which is then tied to the
Lineloks at the corners of the shelter.
This arrangement needs to be designed to accommodate different pitch
heights of the shelter.
On a calm night, when more airflow is desired, the shelter can be pitched higher by extending the trekking poles and corner guylines. |
The entry doors are a masterpiece of simplicity and functionality. There is no zipper; the doors overlap to seal, and a toggle & loop holds them closed. |
The following videos provide tours of the outside and inside
of the Duplex Tarp.
Performance
Although tent weights are typically given as the “trail
weight” or “minimum weight”, it is often unclear what is included, which is
frustrating. For the Duplex Tarp, the minimum weight of the shelter plus
guylines, groundsheet, and six stakes is 14.9 ounces. I removed the guylines
from the sloping walls of the tent, and use six shepherd hook stakes instead of
the recommended eight. These ultralight stakes work quite well, if you put a
rock on them.
As a 1-person shelter, the Duplex Tarp is hard to beat; it
provides an enormous amount of protected area and excellent shelter from
weather.
As a 2-person shelter, the 53-inch width of the Duplex Tarp
provides adequate room for two sleepers plus gear; that’s more then you get in
most tents. When the sloping walls are staked to the ground, the shelter has
enough headroom so I don’t brush against the inside wall when I sit up, but
that requires the footbox of my sleeping bag being against the opposite wall
(I’m 6 feet tall).
When weather and bugs permit, the shelter can be pitched
higher to get even more protected area inside. That’s usually a calm night when
you want more air circulation through the tent to prevent condensation. I like
to leave one or more door panels open at night, when conditions permit, for
ventilation and easy entry/exit.
Since my testing was done in late summer, I didn’t have an
opportunity to test the shelter’s bug-resistance. However, I note that even when
the sloped walls of the shelter are staked to the ground, the vestibules are
raised about 8 inches off the ground. That would allow insects to enter fairly
easily, so a headnet may be necessary when camping with bugs.
The raised vestibules are also an issue when it’s windy. Although
the best wind-resistance is achieved by orienting a vestibule into the wind,
that orientation allows wind to enter under the vestibule and invade the
interior. Orienting a sloped wall, staked to the ground, to the wind keeps the
wind out better, but it makes the shelter more susceptible to strong gusts, and
the shelter contorts more. Using the mid-wall guylines would help to deflect
the wind.
On one early September backpacking trip we camped in a
beautiful basin at 12,500 feet. It was sunny and windy the day we arrived, and
stormy late that night extending into the morning. We didn’t have the shelter
oriented right for good wind protection (described above), so it was breezy
inside. However, the shelter provided excellent protection from rain, hail, and
snow, as good as any tent we have tested.
One nice thing about a Cuben Fiber shelter is, once
tensioned, the material does not absorb water and sag, requiring re-tensioning,
as with a nylon fabric shelter.
And one thing to keep in mind when using a floorless
shelter, is to choose a campsite with good drainage away from the shelter. When
it’s raining, water often pools on a compacted campsite, and you don’t want
that puddle inside the shelter! The same principle applies to a floored tent,
but more so to a floorless shelter.
Assessment
A floorless shelter is not for everyone and every situation,
but if you are an experienced ultralight backpacker, and have camping
conditions suitable for a floorless shelter, it is a great way to reduce weight
and increase versatility. In the case of the ZPacks Duplex Tarp, you get all of
the benefits of the well-designed Duplex for only half of the weight and about
60% of the cost.
Ten years ago, who would have thunk than an ultralight
backpacker could include a 2-person shelter with two doors in a 6-pound Mountain
SuperUltralight (M-SUL) gear kit. If you are not familiar with that term, read
my series on M-SUL
backpacking at www.Backpackinglight.com.
The ZPacks Duplex Tarp (and many other trekking pole supported Cuben Fiber
shelters) makes it possible to have a SuperUltraLight gear kit and also have a
very roomy protective shelter. I personally like an enclosed shelter for a good
night’s sleep. A shelter like this is also called an “enclosed tarp”, which may
be more descriptive, but it is hard to keep from calling it a tent.
The Duplex Tarp is somewhat hidden on the Zpacks website; you
need to click on the Duplex Tent, and down a ways there are a pair of
configuration/pricing gadgets, the right one showing the Tarp option. It was a
lightbulb moment for me when I found it, because I realized I could get a
Duplex for half the weight and 60% of the cost; compared to $599 (pricey) for
the Tent, the Tarp costs $375 (a great value for a Cuben Fiber shelter).
From my 15 years of experience as a gear tester and
reviewer, formerly with Backpacking Light magazine and now freelancing on my
own, and having tested numerous shelters over the years, I can confidently
state that the ZPacks Duplex Tarp is my current favorite. It’s a sturdy design,
well-constructed, user-friendly, and very versatile and functional for
ultralight backpacking. You need to be an ultralight backpacker, place a high
priority on light weight and functionality, and have the appropriate situation,
to fully appreciate the Duplex Tarp. For a M-SUL backpacker, it’s a great find.
Thanks for the review. Very tempted to buy one (I own the Zpacks Hexamid Solo w. bugscreen, but the Duplex provide much more space, liveability and stormworthyness). Always a pleasure to read your thorough reviews. Greetings from Denmark. - Terje
ReplyDeleteIt's a good choice. I previously used the Hexamid Twin for several years. I liked it, but I like the Duplex Tarp better for the reasons you mention.
ReplyDeleteIt's a good choice. I previously used the Hexamid Twin for several years. I liked it, but I like the Duplex Tarp better for the reasons you mention.
ReplyDeleteDo feel that the Hexamid Solo version of the tarp would be good enough to deal with the mosquitoes in Colorado? I don't often have problems with mosquitoes there. Mostly, during the day--can't recall a night with mosquitoes once the temps drop below 55 F or so.
ReplyDeleteThanks for sharing this amazing gear. you can also take camping shower tent for your gear too
ReplyDeleteThanks for this steps Garmin Striker 4 Review
ReplyDeleteThis was an interesting read. You made some good points but I'm not fully convinced of your conclusion. More evidence would have strengthened your argument. Overall though it was thought-provoking. tarpaulin
ReplyDelete