The latest version of the Altra
Lone Peak
version 3.5 (low mesh style tested) leaves nearly nothing to complain about.
They are very dialed in every detail and dependably provide comfort, support,
cushioning, and traction on the trail and off.
By Will Rietveld
I tested the Altra Lone Peak 3.5 for ultralight backpacking.
Here are a few things we look for in footwear for hiking and backpacking:
- Ultralight backpackers usually prefer a trail running shoe because of their light weight. Specifically, we like an all-synthetic upper, moderately cushioned midsole, stability shoe with good rock protection and grippy outsole.
- We prefer mesh shoes rather than waterproof, because they are cooler to wear and dry out quickly. Waterproof shoes are slow to dry once they get wet inside.
- Choosing a shoe is all about fit, so footwear is a very personal thing. Once you find a brand you like, stick with it.
That said, I see more UL backpackers wearing Altra footwear
than any other shoe. It’s becoming a cult favorite. Why? I explain some of the
reasons in this review.
Altra Lone Peak 3.5 Low Mesh shoe. (Altra photo) |
Specifications and Features
Manufacturer
|
Altra Running (www.altrarunning.com)
|
Model
|
Lone Peak 3.5 Low Mesh
|
Platform
|
25mm stack height, zero-drop
|
Weight
|
Measured weight size men’s 12: 12.25 oz/shoe, mfr
specification 9 oz/shoe for men’s size 9
|
Features
|
Durable air mesh upper, dual layer EVA midsole, MaxTrac
TrailClaw rubber outsole, StoneGuard rock plate, FootShape toebox, Gaiter
Trap
|
MSRP
|
$120
|
Description
The Lone
Peak is available in four
versions for men and women: Low with mesh upper, Low with NeoShell upper, Mid
with mesh upper, and Mid with NeoShell upper. I chose the Low with mesh upper
because it is the lightest and most breathable version.
The new version 3.5 is an update, not a makeover. Changes
are a more durable mesh upper, drainage holes to help keep feet dry, and a
4-point gaiter attachment. I tested the shoe with Altra’s current Trail Gaiter
since their new 4-Point Gaiter was not yet available.
The |
Testing
I tested the Lone Peak 3.5 on a total of 15 outings totaling 21 days, which included backpacking, day hiking, and trail running. The shoes got some rough use, far beyond ordinary hiking on trails. |
For background information, I tried zero-drop shoes for
hiking when they first came out a few years ago, and suffered foot problems
from lack of transitioning to them. This time around I transitioned through
testing several shoes and boots with 3-4 millimeters of heel rise, which is
becoming more common. The move to the zero-drop Altras did not result in any problems,
although I still needed to concentrate on developing a whole foot landing
rather than a heel strike.
My comments are organized in the following categories:
Design, Materials,
and Construction – I love the shoe’s wide toebox and snug heelcup. For me,
the extra width is mandatory because I have wide feet. I wore thinner socks in
the shoes and used up every bit of width they had, and wished for a little
more. Most readers with normal feet should find the toebox roomy. The rand
extends out from the upper, which helps protect the upper from abrasion, and gives
the shoes a bigger contact area to soften impact and increase traction.
The mesh used in the upper is plenty durable; seams are sewn
rather than welded. Inspecting the shoes after my testing, I found some broken
stitching here and there, but no seams coming apart. The extended rand helped a
lot to reduce abrasion on the upper.
Cushioning and
Padding – Just right, in the midsole and around the ankle.
Rock Protection –
Again just right. I hiked through a lot of sliderock and didn’t feel a thing
through the bottom of the shoes.
Traction – The
tread on these shoes is sufficient to get a good grip on a variety of surfaces,
and outsole looks like it will last the life of the shoes.
Durability –
Despite the rough terrain I have taken them through, the Lone Peak 3.5 is
holding up very well. No holes in the uppers, no seams coming apart, and lots
of tread left.
Stability – Very
good; no problems in most conditions, but some rollover in off-camber
situations like hiking across steep sidehills.
Trail Gaiter – I
tested Altra’s Trail Gaiter along with the shoe. The shoe has a gaiter hook on
the front and a “Gaiter Trap” at the heel, which holds the gaiters securely.
The Gaiter Trap is ingenius; two Velcro tabs on the back of the gaiter are
sandwiched between two Velcro tabs at the heel of the shoe. I didn’t test
Altra’s new 4-Point gaiter, but I must say I am satisfied with the existing
attachment. The gaiters rarely came loose and show little or no wear.
Assessment
The latest version of the Altra Lone Peak , version 3.5 low mesh tested,
leaves nearly nothing to complain about. They are very dialed in every detail
and dependably provide comfort, support, cushioning, and traction on the trail
and off.
The Lone Peak 3.5 at the end of my testing period. |
My personal preference is for welded uppers, for better
durability. The nemesis of wearing trail runners for off-trail backpacking and
hiking is broken stitching which results in seams coming apart. After my
testing the shoes do have some broken stitching here and there, but the seams
are still holding together, so far. Altra must have a reason for staying with
stitching on their shoes; perhaps it is the shoe design or stitching method,
but it seems to work.
My comments only pertain to the mesh version of the Lone
Peak 3.5. The NeoShell version is another animal. Personally, I am quite
content with the mesh version: they do get wet easily, but they dry out fast
too.
No comments:
Post a Comment